Brexit: UK to be ‘educated’ about penalties, says Barnier

97650386 mediaitem97650370
97650386 mediaitem97650370

news image

David Davis and Michel BarnierImage copyright

Image caption

The most modern salvos attain after a week of Brexit talks animated David Davis (left) and Michel Barnier

The EU’s Brexit negotiator has acknowledged he sees the system as a probability to “insist the British other folks and others what leaving the EU design”.

Michel Barnier acknowledged he would by no design resort to blackmail but saw it as his job to “educate” the UK about the rate it could well pay for leaving the EU “club”.

The UK has hit abet, asserting the EU does “now not desire to chat about the longer term”.

Brexit Secretary David Davis acknowledged it used to be “skittish” and the UK would now not be bounced into a divorce invoice deal.

The most modern salvos attain after a week of talks in Brussels about the UK’s withdrawal from the EU – scheduled to happen in March 2019 – which increased tensions between the 2 aspects.

The EU suggested runt substantive growth had been made on three key “separation” disorders, the dimension of the UK’s financial liabilities to the EU, the design forward for the Irish border and voters’ rights after Brexit.

Mr Barnier accused the UK of “nostalgia” and solid doubt on whether ample growth had been made to develop the discussions, within the autumn, to lend a hand in suggestions the UK’s submit-Brexit shopping and selling relationship with the EU.

This resulted in a cool response from British ministers, surely one of whom, World Alternate Secretary Liam Fox, acknowledged the UK would now not be blackmailed into doing a deal on cash in issue to originate discussions on substitute.

‘Severe penalties’

Speaking at a conference in Italy on Saturday, Mr Barnier acknowledged he did now not desire to punish the UK for leaving but acknowledged Brexit could maybe well be “an academic process” for the British.

“I really have a frame of suggestions – now not aggressive… but I’m now not naïve,” he told the Ambrosetti dialogue board.

Media playback is unsupported for your scheme

Media captionDavis: “This invoice is about guaranteeing continuity”

“There are extremely predominant penalties of leaving the single market and it hasn’t been explained to the British other folks. We intend to educate other folks… what leaving the single market design.”

On the residing of finance, he acknowledged the UK must pick up some key principles, corresponding to honouring the dedication it made in 2014 to pay 14% of the EU funds until 2020

He acknowledged that a future free substitute deal could maybe well be assorted to all others within the previous and there needed to be assurances there could maybe well be no unfair competition within the pick up of social, environmental or fiscal dumping, or instruct aid.

Nonetheless talking to BBC One’s Andrew Marr Indicate, Mr Davis insisted the UK would now not be forced into agreeing an EU divorce invoice until it is sure the sums being demanded are handsome.

He brushed off newspaper experiences the UK had secretly agreed to pay a figure of as much as £50bn as “nonsense”.

The UK used to be assessing the EU’s financial requires on an item-by-item foundation in a “very British and pragmatic model” – which he acknowledged the EU found sophisticated.


While Mr Davis acknowledged he in my blueprint cherished his counterpart, he acknowledged the European Commission risked making itself appear “silly” when it claimed no growth had been made in areas corresponding to make a choice up proper of entry to to welfare and healthcare rights all the design through Europe for British expats.

“What he’s thinking about undoubtedly is he’s now not getting the reply on cash… they’ve instruct this as much as try and create strain on us on cash… they’re trying to play time towards cash”.

He added: “We’re going through [the bill] line by line, and so that they’re finding it sophisticated due to we have obtained correct lawyers… He wants to position strain on us, which is why the stance this week within the click conference. Bluntly, I contemplate it looked a runt bit silly, due to plainly there had been issues that we have finished.

Image caption

Sir Keir Starmer denied Labour had done a u-flip over its membership of the single market and customs union

“We build other folks sooner than process, what they’re at risk of doing is striking process sooner than other folks”.

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson acknowledged about a of the figures touted for the dimension of the divorce invoice had been “extravagant” and the UK would greatest appreciate a number that used to be “predominant and validated in law”.

“We will procure a design to surely honour our correct tasks as we mark them,” he acknowledged, whereas stressing the UK would “surely now not pay for pick up proper of entry to to the European markets”.

‘Grown-up politics’

The persevering with tit-for-tat between the 2 aspects comes as Downing Avenue known as for team spirit among its MPs as they prepare to debate the authorities’s flagship Brexit invoice.

The EU Withdrawal Invoice will repeal the law that paved the manner for the UK to affix the European Economic Neighborhood within the Seventies and convert 40 years value of EU statutes into home law.

Labour has acknowledged this could watch to amend the invoice to discontinue the authorities from automatically accruing original powers after Brexit.

The opposition is courting europhile Conservative MPs, claiming its residing on final within the single market and customs union for the duration of any Brexit transition is extra “determined and coherent” than the Tories.

“To advocate, as some produce, that it’s essential to maybe be in a space to have, as it had been, bespoke, special preparations negotiated between now and March 2019 is nonsense, and so right here’s grown-up politics from the Labour occasion within the public passion,” shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer told Andrew Marr.

Nonetheless Mr Davis acknowledged Labour used to be onto its “presumably seventh, eighth, ninth” policy on Brexit and the opposition knew the rules used to be necessary to guaranteeing correct sure bet and honest correct continuity as the UK takes responsibility for policy in a extensive form of areas.

Learn Extra

What do you think?

0 points
Upvote Downvote

Total votes: 0

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 0

Downvotes percentage: 0.000000%