,

National Well being Protection Plan but any other pack of lies, says Congress

National Well being Protection Plan but any other pack of lies, says Congress
THJC-HEALTHCARE1

news image

The Congress on Saturday picked holes within the statements made by Well being Minister J.P. Nadda and Finance Secretary Hasmukh Adhia on National Well being Protection Plan geared toward extending successfully being insurance to extra than 10 crore households.

Here’s the third successfully being design that the Modi authorities has presented within the closing three years, Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala talked about. “Within the February, 2016 Funds, it presented Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana, which promised an insurance duvet of ₹1 lakh. By December 2016, nothing had took dwelling on it.” Within the 2017 Funds, a brand fresh design promised an insurance duvet to 26.fifty seven crore under-poverty-line cardholders. A duvet of ₹30,000 changed into once promised. By 2017-cease, over 21 crore BPL cardholders had no longer received any successfully being card. “Now, in 2018, within the name of Modicare, they’ve attain up with but any other pack of lies,” he talked about.

The authorities itself changed into once in confusion, he talked about. “Finance Minister Arun Jaitley says we are in a position to put in power the design, Finance Secretary Hasmukh Adhia says it shall be utilized from October, Well being Minister J.P. Nadda says the Centre will possess handiest half of of the price and the remainder has to be paid by the States. Whom must the unhappy judge,” he asked.

CPI(M) fresh secretary Sitaram Yechury talked about no funds had been allocated for the design.

Political gimmick

“If 10 crore households are to be given an insurance duvet of ₹5 lakh, you wish at the least ₹1.5 lakh crore. Where is the money? It is miles nothing nevertheless a gimmick meant to hoodwink voters in an election year,” he talked about.

This design would want thrice the sum allocated for the Union Well being Department, he talked about. On Mr. Nadda’s statement that the States must possess half of of the price, he talked about it would be a violation of States’ correct.

Read More

What do you think?

0 points
Upvote Downvote

Total votes: 0

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 0

Downvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *