Supreme Court holds Jaiswal, CJAR attorney’s efforts ‘contemptuous, unethical’


files image

The Supreme Court on Tuesday held petitions by suggest Kamini Jaiswal and the NGO Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reform (CJAR) represented by Prashant Bhushan as “contemptuous, unethical, derogatory and deprecating to the integrity of this noble institution.”

Studying out the judgment to those assembled in court docket, Justice Arun Mishra said, “We’ve noticed that we (judges) are no longer above the legislation. Then again high we’re, we’re no longer above the legislation. However all the pieces must be as per task.”

The court docket, nevertheless, stopped wanting initiating contempt proceedings, announcing, “Let us unite, work for the noble institution.”


The apex court docket held that it became once contemptuous on part of senior counsel to like dialogue board shopping. “Justice Chelameswar’s court docket became once no longer told by Ms. Jaiswal that the same petition became once already listed earlier than Justice Sikri.”

The court docket also acknowledged that the Constitution Bench resolution on November 10 that most effective the Chief Justice of India has the authority to command Benches within the Supreme Court is binding.

In an oral commentary on Monday within the Supreme Court, Justice Arun Mishra had called the allegations levelled against the CJI by Mr. Bhushan as “scurrilous and per se contemptuous.”

“The petitions [have] scandalised this noble institution. The hurt has already been performed. Each person is doubting the Supreme Court that too, merely on the premise of rumours unfold. How can we restore this hurt?” he said.

Attorney Classic Okay.Okay. Venugopal also agreed with the decide announcing there became once a “crisis of self belief.”

Read More

What do you think?

0 points
Upvote Downvote

Total votes: 0

Upvotes: 0

Upvotes percentage: 0.000000%

Downvotes: 0

Downvotes percentage: 0.000000%